Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Oracle settles SEC charges over secret India payments

Reprints

(Reuters)—Oracle Corp. agreed to pay a $2 million fine to settle U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charges that an India subsidiary secretly set aside money used to make unauthorized payments to phony vendors in that country.

Thursday's settlement, which involved no admission of wrongdoing, resolved charges that the world's third-largest software company violated the federal Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

In a complaint filed with the federal court in San Francisco, the SEC said that between 2005 and 2007, employees of Oracle India Private Ltd structured transactions with India's government that allowed distributors to "park" $2.2 million of proceeds, "creating the potential for bribery or embezzlement."

The SEC said the employees directed the distributors to make unauthorized payments to local vendors, several of which did no work for Oracle, and that some payments were documented with fake invoices. It said the set asides occurred approximately 14 times and concerned eight government contracts.

"Through its subsidiary's use of secret cash cushions, Oracle exposed itself to the risk that these hidden funds would be put to illegal use," Marc Fagel, director of the SEC regional office in San Francisco, said in a statement.

Deborah Hellinger, an Oracle spokeswoman, said the Redwood Shores, Calif.-based company fired the employees responsible for the side funds, and that their activity violated the company's business practices. She also said Oracle disclosed the matter to investigators and has cooperated with the SEC probe.

The case is SEC vs. Oracle Corp., U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 12-04310.

Read Next

  • Majority of executives surveyed say they are exposed to bribery risk: Kroll

    NEW YORK—Despite significant investment in anti-bribery compliance, most executives of large firms are concerned about their exposure to bribery risk, and many are falling short of best practices with respect to third-party screening, facilitating payments and political donations, according to a survey released Wednesday by New York-based Kroll Advisory Solutions.