Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Administration pulls plug on health reform law LTC program

Reprints

WASHINGTON—The Obama administration on Friday pulled the plug on a voluntary long-term care program that was part of the health care reform law.

“We have not identified a way to make CLASS work at this time,” Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said, referring to the Community Living Assistance Services and Support Act.

Under the program, participants would have paid a monthly premium for five years, after which they would have become eligible for a cash benefit of at least $50 a day that could be used to offset the cost of long-term care services. The program was not expected to begin until next year.

The law directed the HHS secretary to establish automatic enrollment procedures that employers could have used in which employees would have had to opt out if they didn’t want to participate.

Because the program was voluntary, critics say it would have resulted in adverse selection, a point Ms. Sebelius conceded. “This could have led to a vicious cycle where premiums would have to be set higher and higher to cover the likely costs of the benefits, leading fewer and fewer healthier people to sign up for the program,” she said.

Employer groups welcomed the decision.

“Since employers did not have to offer the plan, it didn’t really affect them directly, but if the government set it up, employers might have had to waste time explaining it and answering questions. Plus, if the government put it in and it failed because of the poor insurance design—which it certainly would have—the taxpayers would get stuck with another bailout. Employers might have been taxed for a program that made no sense,” said Helen Darling, president of the National Business Group on Health in Washington.