WASHINGTON—U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy on Monday denied a request from a San Francisco-area restaurant trade association for an emergency order to halt enforcement of San Francisco's health care spending law.The Golden Gate Restaurant Assn. sought the order in the wake of a ruling earlier this month by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals not to review a unanimous 2008 decision by a three-judge appeals court panel upholding the legality of San Francisco law.
In denying the request, Justice Kennedy did not comment.
The outcome of the litigation is important not just to employers in San Francisco, who since the law took effect in January 2008 have been told how much they must spend on workers' health care to avoid big fines. Under the law, large employers must make health care expenditures of $1.85 per hour in 2009 for every eligible employee working at least eight hours a week. Expenditures can include payment of group health insurance premiums, health savings accounts and health reimbursement arrangement contributions, or payments to the city.
The case also is being watched by employers nationwide who fear that the San Francisco law, if upheld, would open the floodgates to a wave of new health care spending laws by other cities and states looking for ways to expand coverage.
Benefits experts say a patchwork of such laws would result in higher health care and administrative costs for employers, as well as make it impossible for multistate employers to offer uniform health care benefit plans.
Golden Gate Restaurant Assn. Executive Director Kevin Westlye said that by June the group will file a request to the Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit ruling.
For reprints of this story, please contact Lauren Melesio at 212-210-0707 or email lmelesio@crain.com
